Changes apply to all in-flight assessments. Historical completed assessments keep their original question text via version snapshots.
Every question is tagged at the database level to exactly one construct. This is the chain a consultant or client can show the stakeholder asking “where did this question come from?”
1 · Item
I am willing to invest personal time in building my AI capability beyond what my employer requires.
أنا مستعد لاستثمار وقتي الشخصي في بناء قدرتي على الذكاء الاصطناعي بما يتجاوز ما يتطلبه صاحب العمل.
2 · Individual factor
Stays open as AI changes how the work gets done - relearns familiar workflows when something better appears, asks where models can fail you, and keeps confidentiality, fairness, and policy in view when deciding what to feed into a system.
3 · Mapped AC competencies (drives course recommender + Learning Plan)
4 · Score map
| Option | Score (1–5) |
|---|---|
| 1 - Strongly Disagree | 1 |
| 2 - Disagree | 2 |
| 3 - Neutral | 3 |
| 4 - Agree | 4 |
| 5 - Strongly Agree | 5 |
No validation evidence captured for this question yet. Click below to ask Claude for an AI-suggested anchor against the curated bibliography in the methodology brief. Suggestions are saved as ai_proposed and require admin review before they appear in any client report.
For multiple choice / yes-no, enter options and score_map as JSON.